![]() ![]() The idea was to create a system of punishments so that people did not take the law into their own hands. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. As it appears in Babylonian Law, Hebrew Law, and the Code of Hammurabi, 'an eye for an eye' was meant to keep people from retaliating on their own, for fear that the retribution would be worse than the original crime. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. ![]() The lex talionisis cited by key retributivists, including its leading proponent, Immanuel Kant, who asked “what kind and what amount of punishment is it that public justice makes its. The lex talionis is otherwise known as the view that punishment for crimes must exact “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” It dates at least to the law of Moses and the Code of Hammurabi, and the general idea is cited in modern times by both scholars and laypeople in support of punishment that “fits the crime.” The lex talionis is sometimes used as a justification of retributivist punishment, which requires that the guilty receive their due punishment as a matter of right or justice, although it is less of a justification and more of a statement of the proper target of punishment (the guilty) and degree of punishment (proportionality). In one chilling case, a man was this month sentenced to be blinded after he left a neighbour unable to see in one eye during a fight back in 2018. And disturbingly, the victim's families are often encouraged to take part in executions themselves under the law. The classical formulation of the view that the guilty must be punished in exact proportionate to their crimes: “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” Victim of an acid attack whose assailant was blinded as part of the 'eye for eye' laws. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |